Comparison between monarchy // dictatorship, representative and participatory democracy

From an individual perspective ...

Monarchy: you have practically no voice. The problems of your life are directly and indirectly decided by a tiny group of powerful people who are chosen for their inbreeding, never on merit or on the wisdom of being able to be fair to you.

Dictatorship: you also have no decision-making power, always at the mercy of the powerful, because the level of hierarchical discrepancy is as high as that of a monarchical regime.

Representative democracy: what little we have. You can be represented by one or more groups of political, ideological identity, etc. based on this pluralism that constitutes the populations of complex societies. But, their individual power of direct participation in decisions is minimal. You may be lucky to be contemplated by those who are supposed to or variably represent you.

Participative democracy: the individual would have, a priori, the same parity of participation and even of decision, depending on his discernment or understanding of what is being addressed, because no form of authoritarianism without negotiation, dialogue or conciliation would be tolerated.